Lawyer David Serna Shares Being A Member of NADC’s Top One Percent

 In 2015, the National Association of Distinguished Counsel selected nationally-recognized lawyer David Serna as a Nation’s Top One Percent member. This list represents the top one percent of attorneys in the whole United States, which is why it is one of the most coveted honors. Ever since criminal defense lawyer David Serna first started practicing criminal law in 1977, he received many sought-after honors and the esteem of his fellow defense lawyers and judges before whom he has appeared. He also held positions of distinction. Lawyer David Serna also passionately believes in the constitutional guarantees of individual freedom and liberty, which is reflected in his practice style.

 

What is the NADC?

The National Association of Distinguished Counsel is committed to promoting the highest legal excellence standards in the United States of America. It aims to recognize attorneys who raise the Bar’s standards and provide a benchmark for their fellows to emulate. Only the elite few who demonstrate the highest ideals of the legal profession get the privilege and honor of joining the ranks of the NADC.

 

How do you become a member of NADC’s Top One Percent?

The process has four stages. In stage one, an in-house research team or a nomination identifies the candidates from across the country. Only accepted members of the NADC, fellow attorneys, and current or former clients are allowed to nominate. Second, the researchers employ a lengthy vetting process using multiple factors from information sourced from publicly available information. Third, a blue-ribbon panel studies the research team’s results and carefully determines who possess the background, achievements, and ability to serve as a model for other attorneys to emulate. Lastly, a judicial review board, led by former judges, approves the final candidates to ensure that the selected “Top One Percent” are only the ones who have a stellar reputation and outstanding performance and epitomize the ideals of the legal profession. This rigorous process is what makes lawyer David Serna feels most honored. Among all the other outstanding lawyers in the nation, the NADC selected him as part of the top attorneys.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Impeaching a Witness Based on Inconsistencies

One way to undermine the evidence of an opponent is to impeach his or her witnesses based on inconsistencies in his or her testimony. Lawyers are always advised to listen during the direct and cross-examination because this is the perfect time to observe the testimony and behavior of the witnesses of their opponent. David Serna, a lawyer of over 40 years, offers helpful tips to both new and experienced lawyers. Today, he discusses prior statements of witnesses governed by the Federal Rules on Evidence 613. Discrepancies in testimonies are expected when several witnesses are testifying to the same incident. It is but natural that these individuals remember the details of the incident differently.   However, lawyers should consider only those errors and testimonial inconsistencies that are significant and deserving of the jury’s attention. Persistently bringing up minor inconsistencies will only waste the time of the court and will most likely annoy the jury. FRE 613 prov...
Read more

Cross-Examination of a Crash Reconstructionist

Crash reconstruction is a science that involves mathematics and physics to determine what happened before, during, and after a collision. Reconstruction witnesses testify about the details of a collision, such as the speed of a vehicle, the cause of a collision, and the motion of the vehicle before and after an impact. David Serna, a lawyer of over 40 years, advises young prosecutors in preparing for the cross-examination of defense reconstruction witnesses. The prosecutor must know whether the evidence or data gathered and used by the witness supports a reliable conclusion. Here are three things to remember before conducting a cross-examination of reconstruction witnesses. 1.        Review the crash report It is important to read the crash report of the opponent’s expert crash reconstructionist. The prosecutor’s crash reconstructionist can help him understand the factors considered by the opponent’s reconstruction witness and determine the shor...
Read more

The Rules on Preliminary Hearing and Trial

Preliminary Hearings take place before a judge and only after the prosecutor has filed charges against a person. These hearings are not trials, which may be conducted before a group of individuals, called a grand jury. There are, however, procedural rules on trial that similarly apply to preliminary hearings. In this brief article, David Serna, a lawyer and educator for many years, discusses some of the rules that apply to preliminary hearings and trials. Like a trial, an ordinary witness can testify during a preliminary hearing. Generally, the testimony must be based on what they perceive and not on opinion. However, during a preliminary hearing, unlike a trial, hearsay evidence is allowed and admissible. Three things can happen after a preliminary hearing. If the charges are weak and unfounded, the judge would most likely dismiss the case outright. If there is, however, a finding of probable cause, the judge may either reduce or retain the charges made by the prosecutor...
Read more