Courtroom Etiquette for Lawyers


Many lawyers, both old and new, take courtroom etiquette for granted. Being polite and behaving respectfully in court will leave an impression not only on the judge but also on the jurors, on your clients, and your opponents.
While almost all lawyers have watched how a trial is conducted on television, only a few have been in a courtroom. The experience varies. Sometimes, the environment can be intimidating. Other times, it feels welcoming. Today, David Serna, a lawyer based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, shares some useful tips on how to behave in court.

1.       A non-combative tone helps your case.

Judges make errors. Although lawyers may suggest corrections when this happens, they must do so properly, timely, and politely. Never raise your voice. Let the judge finish speaking before you express your concerns or ask questions. Interrupting the judge makes you look aggressive or too eager. Timing is everything. You do not want to come off as arrogant and at the same time, you do not want to seem timid.

2.       Remind your clients and witnesses about proper courtroom behavior and proper attire.

Rules of etiquette and conduct are sometimes posted outside the courtroom. Don’t ignore them. These rules may vary depending on the judge. Any person may be removed by security personnel and be cited for contempt if the attendee behaves disrespectfully in the courtroom. The judge expects everyone—the jurors, the clients, the witnesses, the observers, and the lawyers—to behave properly.

3.       Be mindful of body language and the words you use.

As a rule, everyone must refer to the judge as “your honor”. However, according to David Serna, a lawyer for the defense, there are instances when some judges prefer being addressed differently. It would be good to ask the court attendant or the bailiff before the hearing begins.
Frowning, raising your eyebrows, rolling your eyes, and other negative facial expressions are discouraged. While there are some things you may disagree with during trial, you do not want to look impolite.

Read more about litigation and courtroom etiquette. Get more tips from David Serna, a lawyer of over 40 years and a reputable lecturer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Impeaching a Witness Based on Inconsistencies

One way to undermine the evidence of an opponent is to impeach his or her witnesses based on inconsistencies in his or her testimony. Lawyers are always advised to listen during the direct and cross-examination because this is the perfect time to observe the testimony and behavior of the witnesses of their opponent. David Serna, a lawyer of over 40 years, offers helpful tips to both new and experienced lawyers. Today, he discusses prior statements of witnesses governed by the Federal Rules on Evidence 613. Discrepancies in testimonies are expected when several witnesses are testifying to the same incident. It is but natural that these individuals remember the details of the incident differently.   However, lawyers should consider only those errors and testimonial inconsistencies that are significant and deserving of the jury’s attention. Persistently bringing up minor inconsistencies will only waste the time of the court and will most likely annoy the jury. FRE 613 prov...
Read more

Cross-Examination of a Crash Reconstructionist

Crash reconstruction is a science that involves mathematics and physics to determine what happened before, during, and after a collision. Reconstruction witnesses testify about the details of a collision, such as the speed of a vehicle, the cause of a collision, and the motion of the vehicle before and after an impact. David Serna, a lawyer of over 40 years, advises young prosecutors in preparing for the cross-examination of defense reconstruction witnesses. The prosecutor must know whether the evidence or data gathered and used by the witness supports a reliable conclusion. Here are three things to remember before conducting a cross-examination of reconstruction witnesses. 1.        Review the crash report It is important to read the crash report of the opponent’s expert crash reconstructionist. The prosecutor’s crash reconstructionist can help him understand the factors considered by the opponent’s reconstruction witness and determine the shor...
Read more

The Rules on Preliminary Hearing and Trial

Preliminary Hearings take place before a judge and only after the prosecutor has filed charges against a person. These hearings are not trials, which may be conducted before a group of individuals, called a grand jury. There are, however, procedural rules on trial that similarly apply to preliminary hearings. In this brief article, David Serna, a lawyer and educator for many years, discusses some of the rules that apply to preliminary hearings and trials. Like a trial, an ordinary witness can testify during a preliminary hearing. Generally, the testimony must be based on what they perceive and not on opinion. However, during a preliminary hearing, unlike a trial, hearsay evidence is allowed and admissible. Three things can happen after a preliminary hearing. If the charges are weak and unfounded, the judge would most likely dismiss the case outright. If there is, however, a finding of probable cause, the judge may either reduce or retain the charges made by the prosecutor...
Read more